Research Philosophy Wall

The Architecture of
Coordinated Power

Intellectual propositions on statecraft, strategic autonomy, and the future of multipolar order — drawn from original theoretical contributions.

Samanvaya Doctrine Counterbalance Engagement Theory Indo-Pacific Strategy Middle-Power Statecraft
Samanvaya Doctrine · Core Axiom "

Power is not what you accumulate — it is what you orchestrate.
A state need not be the loudest voice in the room to shape the room's direction.
Coordination, not coercion, is the grammar of durable influence.

— On the central distinction driving the Samanvaya Doctrine, 2026

01 · Constraint

"

Scarcity is not India's weakness.
It is the very condition that forces strategic creativity — the discipline to do more with alignment than others do with abundance.

— Resource Constraint as Strategic Variable, IJNRD 2026

02 · Multipolarity

"

In a multipolar world, the most consequential nations are not those who lead blocs — they are those who refuse to be trapped in one.

— On India's Multi-Platform Positioning, The Academic 2025

03 · Presence

"

Absence is never neutral.
When India vacates an institutional space, adversarial narratives do not pause — they expand to fill the void.

— Counterbalance Engagement Theory, The Academic 2025

04 · Samanvaya

Samanvaya Doctrine "

Like an Indian thali — where no single flavour dominates and every element amplifies the others — India's grand strategy finds its genius not in supremacy of any single instrument, but in the purposeful harmony of all of them together.

— Conceptual Foundations of the Samanvaya Doctrine, IJNRD 2026

05 · Legitimacy

"

Coercion buys compliance.
Reassurance builds loyalty.
Only one of these compounds over time.

— On Soft Power as Force Multiplier, IJNRD 2026

06 · Engagement

CET Framework "

Stay in the room — not to agree, but to ensure that no agreement is made without you.

— CET Core Principle, The Academic 2025

07 · Middle Powers

"

Middle powers have long been treated as secondary actors in international relations theory. The Samanvaya Doctrine proposes a different reading: that constrained states, when they coordinate well, can be more strategically consequential than powerful states that act alone.

— On Middle-Power Theory of Strategy, IJNRD 2026

08 · Alliance

"

Formal alliances bind a state to choices it has not yet made. Flexible partnerships preserve the sovereign right to decide — issue by issue, moment by moment.

— Limits of Alliance-Centric Models, IJNRD 2026

09 · Diplomacy

Counterbalance Engagement Theory "

Proactive engagement, even in uncomfortable spaces, is not appeasement — it is counterbalancing through presence. Realism for a connected world.

— CET: Realist Yet Resilient, The Academic 2025

10 · Autonomy

"

India's greatest foreign policy asset is not any single partnership — it is the credible capacity to partner with everyone without being owned by anyone.

— On Strategic Autonomy, The Academic 2025

Synthesis · Both Doctrines "

The future of influence belongs to states that sequence wisely, signal credibly, and resist the temptation of dominance — for in a multipolar world, the ambition to be the only power in the room is the surest path to becoming unwelcome in every room.

— Concluding Synthesis, Research Programme 2025–2026

Intellectual Proposition · Hariom Singh Sisodia

On the Nature of Power

"The Kautilyan tradition never confused capability with wisdom.
Samanvaya reclaims that distinction for the present age —
asking not 'how strong are we?' but 'how intelligently
do we deploy what we have?'"

— On Kautilyan Roots of the Samanvaya Doctrine, 2026